Over 1 million tech questions and answers.

Early benchmarks for the HD4870 are out

Q: Early benchmarks for the HD4870 are out

Our AMD rep gave us the green light to post some preliminary benchmarks of the HD4870s in single and CrossFireX setups. We have the stats on our forums, check it out!

It certainly looks promising for the Reds considering the pricepoint they are offering their HD4800 series cards.

RELEVANCY SCORE 200
Preferred Solution: Early benchmarks for the HD4870 are out

I recommend downloading and running Reimage. It's a computer repair tool that has been proven to identify and fix many Windows problems with a high level of success.

I've used it in the past to identify and fix everything from blue screens (BSOD's), ActiveX errors, corrupt files and processes, dll/exe/sys errors, recover lost memory, Windows update problems, defragging, malware removal etc.

You can download it direct from this link http://downloadreimage.com/download.php. (This link will automatically start a download of Reimage that you can save to your computer.)

A: Early benchmarks for the HD4870 are out

Whoops, realized that the thread title said "3870". The cards are actually the new 4870s. Darned "3" and "4" are easy to hit by mistake.

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 62.4

OK so im planning to build a gaming PC in the next 6months ( i started a thread in the hardware/devices section) and i was originally going for a HD4870x2 but i dont think im going to have he funds for that so i have been looking at a few other cards: ATI 1gb HD4870 (750/900mhz), PowerColor 1gb HD4870 (overclocked 780/925mhz) and the ATI 1gb HD4890 (850/950-1000mhz? not sure). Anyway i was just wondering what people opinions were on these cards and what version or brand should i get?

A:ATI HD4870, PowerColor HD4870 PCS+ or ATI HD4890

Go the 4890. It's newer and quicker than the 4870. It will leave an option for 4890 crossfire down the track.

Read other 9 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 58.8

Hello forums, I captured 21 videos of different games and benchmarks of my ThinkPad X220 in order to help people who are interested to find out how much graphical performance the X220 has and if you can do light gaming with it and uploaded them to my YouTube channel. Have a look here. Ii hope they are helpful to make a decision for buying a used X220 :-) Best regards, Janni

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46.4
Q: Hd4870

Hey
Well i have sorted all my other problems with my pc out and now i am gonna probably make a new one.
That is unless i ask for your assistance. Which i am doing.
I am getting a new GPU ATI Radeon HD4870
The market leading GPU i think. It costs uite a bit and so does my computer. So, i dont want to mess up the install.
I know there are guides and i know how to put it in but i have a few questions.
I have a SLI array at the moment, two nvidia 7950 GPUs, i soubt it, but woth a shot,

Is it possible to make a SLI/Crossifre array. So i have one of my nvidia GPUs working with my new ATI GPU. If it is possible is there a downside?

Not to do with the GPU but anyways, I have a 64 bit intel processor, i guess that is the only thing i need to allow Vista 64 bit to run.​
I think that is all the questions i have at the moment, if i think of anymore i wont hesitate to ask.
I am not getting the components for a few months, i will post about my installation closer to the date.
Thanks in advance
Duncan
 

A:Hd4870

You can't do a Radeon/GF mix array. CF and SLI are very picky about what you use, even of their own kind. Remember to completely remove your own graphics drivers before putting the new card in.
 

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46

hi... i'm looking to upgrade from win7 sp1 to win 10 but im hesitant because i cant find drivers for my hd4870 and i'm a frequent gamer so can someone please help me out here...thanks

A:Windows 10 and HD4870

Only the HD 5000 series and above received drivers for Windows 10. I wouldn't recommend upgrading as you may be bad quality with a default driver.

Read other 11 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46

will this gpu put crossfired be better than a hd5870?

Sapphire Radeon HD4870

A:Radeon HD4870 x2

2 4870x2's in crossfire would beat the Fck out of a 5870....i think

Read other 41 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46

...card is driving me nuts, keeps overheating and cutting out the video. When this happens the monitor goes black (and I have to manually restart the system), I hear the fan spin up to 100% and the LED labeled "D1601" on the card lights up - meaning the card is overheating. This has happened three times in the last 24 hours with fan speeds at 60, 75 and 80%!! I've already applied a better thermal compound on the core which dropped idle temps so I don't know what to do. Is there some other factor I could be overlooking, something else causing the card to overheat like the NB or PCI-E 2.0 chip? I'm at a loss right now so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Thanks in advance.
 

A:Radeon HD4870

Actually one user dismantled his Video Card and found lots of dust under the Heatsink.

Maybe use High Preasure air can to blow out any dust.

What do you...
 

Read other 5 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46

So I like to push my hardware, and to do so I get some stable benchmarks. My Gigabyte Radeon 4870 (512mb Gddr5) has seen me through from my last Core 2 Duo system and into my current Phenom II system, and it has given me no problems until now. I benchmarked the card in the old core2 system with no problems that I recalled.

I do it in the Phenom II (Windows 7 RC1 64) system and as soon as the temps on the card hit 72-74 degC I hear a sizzling sound that sounds sort of like bacon... Of course I quit the benchmark (with beating heart) and the sound stops, presumably as the 4870 declocks itself for normal Windows use. No doubt at all that this is heat related, but graphics cards are built to withstand ridiculous heat, in fact the Catalyst Control Centre's temp gauge pegs 70C in the 'yellow' area and the danger area is above 100C.

I can play World of Warcraft or Half Life 2 (ep2) on full settings @ 1680x1050 without problems, however I they are not too intensive, and I have no better games down in my campus residence - but I can see Cysis racking up that temp and the bacon sound scares me!

What shall I do? I really would like to overclock the GPU...
 

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 46

Hi guys!

Will my Thermaltake Purepower TWV 500W PSU be able to handle an HD4870 with my current setup or will it go boom?

System:
E6600, 2GB, 2HDD, 2 DVD-RW

greets
 

A:hd4870 on 500 watt psu?

Read other 6 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 45.2

Due to a faulty gfx, I'm going for a new gfx off http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php
Anyone got any suggestions in terms of value for price? I just need it to play games like Sims 3 and Mass Effect 2 without any lag or problems.
 

A:Solved: Replacing my 1gb HD4870

Something like this should work fine;
http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=193_962&products_id=13247

Make sure you fully uninstall the old driver before attempting to install the card/driver.
 

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 45.2

Hi everyone, I just installed build 7100 of Windows 7 (first time trying the OS) and am having an annoying issue. I have a widescreen monitor but play a lot of old games, so I rely on GPU scaling to properly use 4:3 resolutions. This works fine in Vista but in my new Win7 installation the option isnt even available in CCC.

Vista:
Win7:
So, what the hell? This is pretty much a deal breaker for me. Back to Vista for now

A:Catalyst 9.4 + HD4870 = no GPU scaling

At least you get the CCC to load.!
It will not open for me (no errors in event viewer etc). Even though it is installed and I can select it by right clicking on the desktop it simply fails to work. I'm using x64 7100.

I have read of another person who can't load CCC and I would imagine that there are still issues with the ATI drivers and W7 - you can fill out a bug report, if you can't get it resolved...

http://www.amdsurveys.com/se.ashx?s=5A1E27D27E29B0E3

Read other 9 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44.8

I'm usually pretty good when it comes to diagnosing and debunking video problems, but this one has me at a complete loss; of course, it's my own flippin' system... awesome. I can't figure out why my 4870 keeps crashing on me whilst gaming, it doesn't make any sense. I think I might just RMA the card eventually but I'd like to see what other people think about the issue first. The last thing I need is to have the replacement card do the same exact thing... which is typically my luck.

The card lasts, on average, about 2 hours before the screen goes black; the behavior after that seems completely random. Sometimes, I get a NO SIGNAL message and have to restart the system manually, and other times, VPU recover will restart the card thus returning video. VisionTek support told me that if the screen was going black that meant the card was overheating. Sometimes, I hear the fan go to 100% when the video cuts out so I'm thinking they might be right. However, I run the fan at ~60%+ when I run games so it seems highly unlikely. I have also applied OCZ FreeZe thermal compound to the core which dropped the "out-of-the-box" temps about 10c! The card never passes 50c on full load w/ the fan running above 50%. Could the vRAM be overheating?

I have tried ATI catalyst drivers 8.8 through 8.10 with absolutely no effect on this crashing. I have tried tweaking settings w/ both RivaTuner and CCC and I have even flashed the card's BIOS via thumb ... Read more

A:Visiontek HD4870 - At a Loss with this Crashing

1. Uninstall the drivers from Add/Remove programs in the Control Panel of Windows.
2. Restart the computer.
3. Run Driver Sweeper*, select the drivers that you have uninstalled and click Clean button.
4. Install the new drivers.

* For Windows Vista users, please run Driver Sweeper in administrator mode.
Right mouse click Driver Sweeper shortcut and click Run as administrator.

To download and install Driver Sweeper, please click HERE. (direct link)
Save DriverSweeper_1.5.5-setup-[Guru3D.com].exe file on the hard disk.
Run DriverSweeper_1.5.5-setup-[Guru3D.com].exe.

---------------------

Of course if the card (or video) is faulting outside Windows, when you first turn on your computer. Then it's not a Windows issue or driver issue

I'd say return it
 

Read other 18 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44.8

Hi, can somebody tell me, where to get HDMI Audio drivers for ATI HD4870 card...

My OS: Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 x64 edition.

A:ATI HD4870 Sound On Vista Ultimate X64

You can click the link below to AMD support in regards to HDMI Audio Driver for the 4800 series card.

Radeon HD 2000/3000/4000 Series - No HDMI Audio Available

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44.8

Hello,
I think that i have a problem with my graphic card driver vs. operating system. All 3D apps (games) crashing after several minutes from launching. In most cases system attempts to restart a graphic driver, but always after several attempts (2-3) i get a BSOD and system crash.

Please help!
(Sorry for my bad english)

A:BSOD PROBLEM Win7 vs. ATI HD4870 1GB

I have examined your files. Most show BC 124. .
It is a hardware problem

Stop 0x124 - what it means and what to try

STOP 0x00000116: VIDEO_TDR_ERROR
Usual causes: Video driver, overheating, bad video card, BIOS, Power to card


Code:
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.11.0001.404 AMD64

Code:
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Loading Dump File [C:\Users\richc46\AppData\Local\Temp\Low\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\GA9XQRVF\Windows7_BSOD_jcgriff2[1]\Windows7_BSOD_jcgriff2\022009-22822-01.dmp]
Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available
Symbol search path is: SRV*c:\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Executable search path is:
Windows 7 Kernel Version 7600 MP (2 procs) Free x86 compatible
Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS
Built by: 7600.16481.x86fre.win7_gdr.091207-1941
Machine Name:
Kernel base = 0x82a54000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x82b9c810
Debug session time: Thu Mar 18 15:31:06.061 2010 (GMT-4)
System Uptime: 0 days 0:07:35.700
Loading Kernel Symbols
...............................................................
................................................................
..................
Loading User Symbols
Loading unloaded module list
.....
1: kd> !analyze -v
*******************************************************************************
* *
* Bugcheck Anal... Read more

Read other 1 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44.8

I've been having a slight problem running Far Cry 2 on my computer lately, seems to be my video card. I have tried running the game from Medium all the way to Very High settings and the result is the same. After about 45 min or so of smooth gameplay my fps start to plummet, almost making the game unplayable (~15fps). I'm pretty sure this video card should be able to chew right through this game no problem so I am a bit concerned with the performance. I thought it could just be the HDR effects and AA I was using but I've played with everything and this happens each time. I have checked the GPU temps which do not rise above 50c so I don't think that it's the card itself. The game did install a new version of DirectX 9 so maybe a fresh reinstall of drivers would possibly do the trick? Thoughts?

Also, I am running my Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz, which is 800mhz above the recommended CPU speed for this game.
 

A:Far Cry 2 with HD4870 512MB Runs Slow

Well I guess the problem isn't with the drivers or DirectX because I tried it again today and it was worse than ever. Total slide show during firefights, couldn't be more than 5fps in some spots, which is absolutely unacceptable for this system considering what I've put into it. I have to say that the game itself isn't all that great either so I'm not gonna cry (no pun intended) about it. This card ran Crysis just fine so I'm just confused as to why this game runs like sh** on my system.

On a side note, I ran Driver Sweeper on the previous install of drivers and now CCC doesn't work at all, won't even open! So now I'm using the latest build of RivaTuner to adjust the card's settings (which didn't make a difference). I thought that was a little peculiar as well...
 

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44.4

Hello everyone!

I've recently bought a new rig and decided to go with Vista Enteprise 64-bit version on it.

I currently have a 30" Dell monitor and a 19" Packard Bell Maestro 190W setup that I used on my previous XP rig.
Now, when I try to use my PB Maestro 190" Screen on the Vista machine, I get no signal. I can detect the monitor through the ATI Catalyst program but it cant it to work.

The monitor works and shows stuff when I reload the computer, but it goes "No signal" just when Vista Loads...
I have downloaded Powerstrip and another monitor program to try and force it to 1440x900 settings, but still no signal.. Even wrote my own drivers for the screen with a fixed resolution 640x) but no luck.
I plugged in my LCD TV instead and it worked like a charm! So i quickly switched the cables between the second 19" monitor and the TV and bam! I got the second monitor up and running!

But I had to reload the computer and I lost the output, tried several times again to repeat the procedure with plugging in the TV and then the monitor.. no luck...
The only thing I havent tried yet is to use a VGA cable instead of the DVI one..
I'm running the lastest ATI drivers (9.3)..

Just find it strange that it can detect the screen, just not send the video signals to it..

Vista installs the second monitor as a "generic pnp monitor".. And I cant seem to find any drivers on this packard bell monitor on the internet.
Anyone got a good advice ... Read more

A:Dual monitor issues.. Ati HD4870.. no luck

Maybe it's your motherboard
Asus has a bios update for this problem

Read other 7 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 44

Every time I try to install either an HD4870 or GTX260 on my system (spec below) the system crashes just as it loads the drivers. Strangely the HD2350 and HD2480 cards I've tried work no problem. The system also runs no problem when using onboard graphics.

At first I thought it was the graphics card so tried the various cards as above, but when the problem was still there after trying the HD4870 and GTX260 I thought it must be a motherboard problem. However, i've now had 3(!) new motherboards and the problem remains, so that rules the motherboard out I think, unless it's some obscure compatibly issue. I know all the cards are OK as I've taken them out of other systems where they work fine.

*All drivers/bios up to date
*Multiple clean installs of drivers (including core drivers with no CCC for example. Also tried older and newer drivers)
*Multiple clean install of the OS
*No system problems with any other components as far as I can tell. (I've ran memtest and CPU stress tests)

OS: W7x64 SP1
Mobo: ASUS P8H67-M (B3 revision)
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K 3.30GHz (Sandybridge)
RAM: OCZ 4gb DDR3
PSU: Corsair HX520 (this should run the system no problem)

dmp file attached. (When using the HD4870)

A:HD4870 and GTX260 crash system, HD2350 doesn't. Why?

Have you tried testing a new power supply? If older/onboard graphics works no problem, your PSU might not be handling the power from the newer GPUs properly.

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 43.6

I just built an HTPC wiith Vista64 SP1 and am having a problem. I have a DFI LanParty X58-T3H6 motherboard and a VisionTek Radeon HD 4870 Video card with HD audio. I have an HDMI cable going to my Sony AV receiver and all I get is Stereo Audio. The subwoofer never comes out of standby nor does the AV receiver indicate anything but a stereo input.

I have the RealTek HDMI audio device installed and it says it is working properly under Device Manager. Under properties all that is offered is Stereo speakers. Surround Sound is shown as an option but it is grayed out and not selectable. All drivers are up to date as of two days ago, and I have the on-board sound of the motherboard disabled in its BIOS.

Other HDMI devices, such as my XBOX 360, do surround sound through the Sony AV receiver.

VisionTek support told me to install the HDMI RealTek driver, but that's all the help they've been able to give me.

If anyone has some additional insight on this, it would be most appreciated!

Thank you!

A:Surround Sound option Grayed out with HD4870 and HDMI connection

Honestly I think that HDMI can sometimes be flaky. I know you said the 360 works fine, but a PC is another animal entirely. I've Never used a HDMI connection to carry BOTH vid/sound FOR THE PC (will run HDMI for vid, but always run separate sound).

If your PC is close to the AV receiver.....A suggestion just to test is -- enable the MB sound and run a cable from the MB to your receiver (digital Optical [toslink] OR coax digital) if you have it, or you can do 3.5mm analog with a Y cable that is 3.5mm to RCA.

How To Connect Your PC to Your Home Stereo or Home Theater | Hardware Secrets

See if that works & then you know the bottleneck is the HDMI somehow & maybe drivers will fix it later, but for now you have (separate) sound that works.

Read other 8 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 43.6

The sticker says 700W which sounds quite muscular but i can't find a brand name. It has a logo that says ADJ and the model number is CG-ADJ-8

I keep hearing about the importance of 12V rails when analysing how good a PSU really is and what it can handle. Might as well be greek to me so I've written the sticker specs below:

Here is what is written on the PSU:

+3.3V(20A) +5V(30A) +12V1(12A) +12V2(14A)
(130W max)

-5V(0.5A) -12V(0.8A) +5VSB(2A)
(9.6W max) (10W max)

I would very much appreciate any help you can give. I have my heart set on a 1gig radeon hd4870 (with extra cooling).

thanks a lot.
 

A:Will my PSU handle a radeon HD4870? Or any of the new breed of power hungry GPUs?

Read other 15 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 41.2

Long before receiving a P72, I had hoped to have been able to view some benchmark results prior to the purchase decision.  In an effort to begin that discussion here, I ran a couple of benchmark tests using MAXON Cinebench and OTOY OctaneBench on a P72 with these selected specs: Lenovo P72Intel Xeon E-2186M 6 Core ProcessorNvidia Quadro P5200 16 GB17.3? UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) wide gamut display64 GB DDR4 2400 MHz (Non-ECC)2 x 2 TB SSD (Raid 1 Mirrored)2 TB 5400 RPM HDDWindows 10 Pro for Workstations https://www.maxon.net/en/products/cinebench/ https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/ I am posting screenshots of the results based on a fresh, out of the box unit, with no tweaking.  All current Windows updates and Lenovo hardware driver and utility updates are installed, and very little else other than Firefox, X-Rite i1Profiler calibration utility, and the benchmark applications. If you have a P72, feel free to post your own specs and benchmark results for comparison purposes.  To my eyes anyway, some of these scores represent in large part why I chose to give the P72 a try as I was seeking the utility of speed and power over extreme portability.  However, due to no Lenovo sRGB compatibility mode and poor internal speaker placement, I am struggling to justify keeping the unit.  Still, if you're after raw power, and can put up with various workarounds like ditching the Windows OS, using only color managed applications, or relying on ... Read more

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 41.2

I just got a new laptop and was wondering what kinds of benchmarks would be good to make sure it performs as well as it should. I'd like to know how to compare it to similarly configured laptops in games and multimedia applications.

Also, is there a way for me to see the make of RAM I have. I know how to find out the amount, but it never says the manufacturer.
 

A:Benchmarks

A quick search for laptop benchmark came up with this CNet page. It shows how they benchmark their laptops, and what programs they use to do it. Worth giving a quick read, at least.

To find out the make of your ram, you can run CPU-Z. It's free, you can download it by clicking the link under 'latest version' in the top left corner of that page. When you run it, click the SPD tab, and it will show vendor information, if it's possible to show it for your system. Some RAM manufacturers don't show, I think. Otherwise, you could just open your memory access panel on your laptop, and take the sticks out (while the laptop is off, of course), there should be a sticker or model number or something on them. Put the number into Google and see what comes up. Good luck!
 

Read other 1 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 41.2

Yay, installed my 7600GT (Waiting for affordable DX10), and I just finished my series of benchmarks, and was very satisfied!

3DMark 2001SE Default Settings
3DMark 2006 Default Settings
Aquamark3 Default Settings
Counter-Strike: Source 1024x768 4xAA Highest Everything (Full HDR)
Half-Life 2: Lost Coast 1024x768 6xAA Highest Everything (Full HDR)
Specs:
Core 2 Duo E6300 Stock w/ Scythe Ninja HSF
eVGA 7600GT Stock
2x1GB pqi Turbo DDR2-667 Cas-4

Opinions?
 

A:The Benchmarks are in!

I thought you had your Core 2 Duo overclocked.....
 

Read other 38 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 41.2

Hello, Everyone I was wondering how do my benchmarks add up if they are strong or weak in performancew for the last few days i was using msi kombuster but with crappy results ussually round 3464 tottal score

This was bugging me for a few days wondering why my card sucks so much im running a hd 5770 now that i discovered a more updated version of msi kombuster these are my new results can someone tell me if good or bad i just did one test not even in full screen next test will be the 1680/1050 full screen im submitting the first three shots and from there i hope to hear some feedback i also couldn't adjust the first resolution it went back to those setting

Thank you in advanced

A:My Benchmarks

Good scores. I have to admit, the 5770 is a better card than the 260 in a lot of ways, but its driver support was so bad that I returned the card out of being sick of it...

Other than that, looks like its doing good.

~Lordbob

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

The purpose of this thread is to provide a download link for each benchmark currently in the benchmarks sub forum.
We will keep these up to date, but if you come across new versions please let us know.
Unigine Heaven (GPU)
Unigine Valley (GPU)
Unigine Sanctuary (GPU)
Unigine Tropics GPU
3D Mark Includes Fire Strike, Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, and Ice Storm(GPU+CPU)
3D Mark 11 (GPU+CPU)
3D Mark Vantage(GPU+CPU)
PC Mark 8 (System)
3D Mark 06 (GPU+CPU)
Catzilla (GPU+CPU)
Passmark Performance Test (System)
Cinebench (GPU+CPU)
Lost Planet 2(GPU)

This is a work in progress as we are recreating benchmarks here on TenForums. I also suggest you run at stock settings first, then if you OC you can compare

A:Links for Benchmarks

download from Guru3D.com

Lost Planet 2 Benchmark.
Pretty Good. DX9 & DX11

Read other 4 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

I have seen postings about computers being slow. Are there any benchmarks that one can use to see if the computer is running as well as expected, given the RAM and the processor speed? Many thanks.
 

A:Speed benchmarks?

When people say there computer is running slow, they normally mean its running 'slower' than it used to and want to know why. This is normally down to spyware, background processes, fragged harddrive plus any number of things.

As for benchmarking, there are many types Dhrystone, Whetstone, PCMark, plus ones for graphics cards (3D mark), look at the following sites www.futuremark.com and www.sisoftware.net.

However be aware that whole subject of benchmarking is a bit more subjective, the same cpu on a different motherboard will give different benchmarks even though the cpu is clocked the same. So just because your setup doesnt give exactly the same as someone with 'apparently' the same setup, its not worth trying to track down why (all very clever electronic magic)! Oh and benchmarks do not always represent a true real-life performance.
 

Read other 1 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Curious about the relative performance of two of my computers, I have made the comparison using benchmark software I have on hand. Fresh Diagnose is the latest release, 5.80.

Here are the results:

Computer #1
Intel Celeron 500 MHZ
ASUS Motherboard
Ext. Clock 66 MHz

Fresh Diagnose Benchmark:
412 MWIPS
1538 MDIPS
Speed 501

Callmark BM System test:
2618
--------------

Computer #1
VIA Cyrex 667 MHz
Soyo SY-7ISA+ Motherboard
Ext. Clock 133 MHz

Fresh Diagnose Benchmark:

15 MWIPS
816 MDIPS
Speed 669

Callmark BM System test:
1728
------------------
Assuming these benchmarks are valid tests of system performance, is there something I can to improve the performance on the SY-7ISA+ system (Computer #2)?

I've set jumpers for the automatic detection of processor speed. What is the correct PCI clock setting and clock ratio for this processor? I'm using 133Mhz X5.

Does a Celeron processor provide improved performance over a similar speed VIA Cyrex?

Is there a better benchmark test for these systems? I believe Computer #2 should outperform Computer #1, but maybe I'm missing something.
 

A:Processor benchmarks

Read other 9 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Source: Dishonored 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review - PC VGA Graphics card guide

Dishonored 2 has this pre-order thing that allows you to play a day early, and so guru3d (and maybe a few more outlets, we'll see) benched it.
Quality settings

The benchmark is done on
the eight-core Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition with Haswell-E based setup on the X99 chipset platform. This setup is running tweaked at 4.30 GHz. Next to that we have energy saving functions disabled for this motherboard and processor (to ensure consistent benchmark results). We use Windows 10 all patched up. Each card runs on the same PC with the same operating system clone.The drivers are:
GeForce cards use the latest 375.76 driver (download drivers).Radeon graphics cards we used the latest AMD Radeon Crimson 16.11.3 Driver (download drivers).

1080P
1440P
4K
VRAM

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,Notebook P570WM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-4930K,Notebook P570WM

A:couple benchmarks

Very good scores

Read other 5 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Geekbench is a free 32 bit benchmark utility (64 bit is a paid version, sry). It gives your PC a numerical score based on a number of factors. It's available for PC's, Mac's and Linux.

You can download the geekbench utility here: Primate Labs Geekbench

Download, run, create a profile and post your benchmarks in this thread.

Here's my geekbench result (total score 4041):

Here's the link to the results online: Geekbench Result Browser: Dell Inc. Dell XPS420

How does your system rate according to geekbench? Some of the fastest systems rate over 10k!

A:Geekbench - Benchmarks

Originally Posted by .Joe


Geekbench is a free 32 bit benchmark utility (64 bit is a paid version, sry). It gives your PC a numerical score based on a number of factors. It's available for PC's, Mac's and Linux.

You can download the geekbench utility here: Primate Labs Geekbench

Download, run, create a profile and post your benchmarks in this thread.

Here's my geekbench result (total score 4041):

Here's the link to the results online: Geekbench Result Browser: Dell Inc. Dell XPS420

How does your system rate according to geekbench? Some of the fastest systems rate over 10k!



I updated my geekbench score, and it's now 4050 (see my sig)

What's your score? Don't be shy, we don't bite

Read other 6 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Hi All----I'm really happy with my computer----maybe, i think, I guess but I'm really not sure. Where can I benchmark it and compare to same or similar other systems? If it compares favorable, then I'm definitely happy and if it doesn't I'll fix it or upgrade.
 

A:compare benchmarks

Try SiSoftware Sandra. It has good benchmarking sets.
 

Read other 3 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

A couple of weeks ago I tried unsuccessfully to install Visual Studio 6 on my XP Home SP2 box. Since then, the performance has been poor. One thing probably has nothing to do with the other but that's when I started to notice that Firefox took 10 to 15 seconds to load and the XP splash screen stayed up longer on a reboot. I've defragmented and run and error check on the hard drive and it has no bad sectors. This evening I downloaded FreshDiagnose and benchmarked the read and write speeds of the hard drive. The read speed is excellent -- over 200 MB/s but the write speed is pathetic -- 3.47 MB/s. This is a Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB SATA-II drive (the parallel recording technology.)

The CD benchmarks are pretty low too. I have a Memorex 16X DL DVD+-RW but the read speed is 3.67 MB/s.

These are all connected to Gigabyte 965SP motherboard having a Pentium D 3.4 gHz processor. Not overclocked and the temps and fan speeds are within normal ranges.

Any ideas? Thanks.
 

A:System Benchmarks Too Low

Read other 9 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

I stumbled upon a site that supposedly shows the Benchmarks of Pascal

If this is what were looking forward too i am keeping my 980's for a very long time

Nvidia Pascal GTX 1080, 1070 1060 Benchmarks Leaked - 3DMark 11 Performance Entries Spotted

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

I just upgraded due to a PIII 450MHZ chip ceasing to function. I went to a PIII 650E chip on the Gigabyte GA-6VXE+ motherboard. I had the same motherboard with the PIII 450 and it was working fine for about a year, and that upgrade was from a micro-ATX motherboard for more slots and higher max on the CPU upgrade. When I took the computer in to have it checked for not booting they originally thought it was the motherboard and replaced it with a new one, but later found that it was the processor. So the Gigabyte GA-6VXE+ motherboard and the PIII 650E chip are new. I had just re-formatted the hard drive for a fresh start and installed the normal programs and Norton Utilities 2000. Under the Norton UT 2000 system benchmarks my PIII 650 was getting fluctuating benchmarks from anywhere between 50.0 to 301.0. The computer's performance also coincided with whatever system benchmark that came up running slow with low system benchmarks and normal with the high benchmarks. I thought at first it may be the voltage supplied to the CPU but the motherboard is auto detecting voltage. I feel that I'm heading down the same road as my previous processor, and while everything is still under warranty, I want this taken care of as soon as possible. Can you help?
 

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Hi techspot,

The Holiday season is coming up once again and the new game titles are rolling out and with benchmarks following...but where is my setup on the list?

http://www.techspot.com/article/128-call-of-duty-5-gpu-performance/page3.html

This is the article I was reading prior to posting. I had realized I've been away from the hardware world for too long and haven't been following the latest releases and comparison to my hardware since the release of the nvidia 8xxx series.

Take this article's test system

Test System Specs: Hardware
- Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 (LGA775) 3.00GHz
- x2 Kingston HyperX 2GB PC3-14400 Module(s)
- ASUS Rampage Extreme (Intel X48)
- OCZ GameXStream (700 watt)
- Seagate 500GB 7200-RPM (Serial ATA300)
- Gigabyte GeForce 9500 GT (512MB)
- Gigabyte GeForce 9600 GSO (384MB)
- Gigabyte GeForce 9600 GT (512MB)
- Gigabyte GeForce 9800 GT (512MB)
- ASUS GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB)
- ASUS GeForce 8800 GTX (768MB)
- Palit GeForce 9800 GTX+ (512MB)
- ASUS GeForce 9800 GX2 (1GB)
- Gigabyte GeForce GTX 260 (896MB)
- ASUS GeForce GTX 280 (1GB)
- Radeon HD 4650 (512MB)
- Palit Radeon HD 4670 (512MB)
- ASUS Radeon HD 3850 (512MB)
- ASUS Radeon HD 3870 (512MB)
- Palit Radeon HD 4850 (512MB)
- ASUS Radeon HD 4870 (512MB)
- VisionTek Radeon HD 3870 X2 (512MB)
- Palit Radeon HD 4870 (1GB)
- ASUS Radeon HD 4870 X2 (2GB)
Software
- Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 (64-bit)
- Intel System Driver 8.4.0.1016
- Nvidia Forceware 180.43 Beta
- ATI Catalys... Read more

A:Where's my graphics on benchmarks?

your card performs below all those cards on high resolution and high settings. And a little better than the 9500 gt on low to med.
 

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Its in German or Dutch or something, but shows a Clawhammer clocked at 800mhz beating a P4 clocked at 1600mhz, in 32bit applications

Anywayz here it is:
Some Clawhammer Benchmarks

Laterz
Cucumber
 

A:Some Benchmarks For The Clawhammer

Cucumber,

Interesting! Slower RAM & 1/3 the FSB too! :grinthumb

Intel has their work cut out for 'em & us consumers will hopefully see some big price cuts coming from them.

Looks like high Mhz isn't necessarily 'better'.

Thanks,
 

Read other 1 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

I was looking at this article that was comparing benchmarks of low-end processors. Generally they looked at Celeron, P4, Duron, and Athlon processors on the Anandtech website:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927&p=12

This test showed that the 1.6Gig Duron Processor and the P4 1.8A Gig Processor both out performed the Intel Celeron Processors. They only tested the one P4 Processor, and it was the cheapest one available on the market. I think a slower P4 processor would actually be a better buy, but Intel just does not make them. They would be a better buy than the Celeron's Available.

The Bottom line is a Celeron is not worth buying. They are basically junk. I think a 256k L2 Cache would significantly improve their performance. The present 128k L2 cache is just not large enough for the processor speed. So Buyer beware.
 

A:CELERON AMD P4 CPU Benchmarks

The 300a Celeron was the only worthwhile Celeron chip. It could OC to 450 & wasn't as crippled as the new versions have been ( slow FSB, small & crippled Cache, overall lackluster performance ).

For people that only use the PC for Office work, I guess it's not so bad. They don't heat much so they generally have very silent cooling systems.

Other then that, I don't see why anyone would want such a chip.
 

Read other 4 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Im running Crysis on a Dual Core E4500 at stock 2.20ghz on an ASUS P5QL MB and BFG 9600 GT OC Edition. DX9 on XP SP3 with 4 Gigs of Corsair RAM.

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

1/2/2009 9:27:20 AM - XP

Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 43.21

Run #2- DX9 1280x720 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 38.00

Run #3- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 32.54

Run #4- DX9 1400x960 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 32.50


Just wondering if this is lower or higher than expected for this type of system.

Thoughts/Advice welcome!
 

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

hi there,
can u plz give me the link from where i can download benchmark programs like 3D-mark or other gaming benchmarks????
thanks in advance.
 

A:where to download benchmarks?

just google for the program u want and u will find it.

http://www.google.com/
 

Read other 1 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Dear frens, my request is a bit long but please dont get bored reading it. Any suggestions will be most welcome. I will acknowledge my results.

My system specs are on the bottom of this page.

1) what is th difference between the nforce4 AMD platform driver and the other AMD/INTEL X16 driver?

2)My A64 3500+ (manchester) 2.2 GHZ is OCed to 2.5 GHZ thru the bios and clockgen . Do i need 2 adjust any voltage, FSB etc etc settings? (am noob in OCing !!)

3) what GPU and CPU tempetature is ok for BFG 7800GT OC (OCed to 500/1150) Is it too high? Should i go to 450/1100? Please look in my system specs for hardware info.

4?is it ok to put my case (with the right panel removed ie motherboad backsite) directly on the airflow of my Room airconditioner (16 degree C) or am i harming my rig withj iths type of cooling??

5) when i run CPU benchmarks during 3dmark05 pro and 3Dmark06 pro
my rig crawls at only 0,1,2 fps. is it normal?

6) N just 1 more thing i ve posted my benchmarks below. what do u think of the results? Normal? High? or Low?
do post ur benchmarks also. i would love to see them !!

And ive got US $200 to spend! what upgrades do u recommend 4 my rig??


MY CONFIG IS

Athlon64 3500+manchester (OCed to 2500 MHZ)
ASUS A8NE nforce4 ultra MOBO
1 GB Corsiar dual channel DDR400
BFG 7800GT OC (OCed to 450/1100)
Stock cooling but 4 high speed ANTEC fans blasting on all sides of the GPU and kept directly on the airflow of my Room airconditioner... Read more

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Hi everyone.
I`m out here hoping anyone could help me with my problem..
So. My R9 280X one day stopped working properly. It allows to launch the PC and use it. But when i launch any game it works until any 3D action happens. Couple of times i`ve launched GAUNTLET and saw a lot of ARTIFACTS in menu, whcih closes and exits to a desktop.
This happens with every game. It just laggs for a second or two (sound plays tho) And exits to Desk without any information.
Also All the GPU benchmarks Freeze after a few secs of work (sometimes whole PC so i have to restart it). I`ve noticed no exact GPU load or temperature numbers (it stays below 50-55).
But one benchmark (userbenchmark.com) managed to go through and showed extremely poor GPU results of ~10%(way below normal in 3D).
Also when i surf around on my pc quickly(swapping between windows and scrolling intensly) image freezes, turns black for a milisecond and goes back to normal condition as `twas. huh..
I`ve peeked into logs and it says AMDKMDAP stopped responding, which means drivers. (also there are some "kernel" errors if that mean anything..)
I used DDU and installed all kind of drivers which didnt help too. I reinstalled windows even.
Also radeon software shows a notification that it detected more than one displays connected while i`m using one.
I`ve swapped between VGA and HDMI. (before all these happened methinks i used both at the same time once, but i dont think its related.
MemTest didnt show anything to... Read more

Read other answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

How do I go about improving a CIS score? I'm confused about the benchmarks. Is this just a list of recommended settings?
 

A:Belarc: CIS Benchmarks?

You'd need to change the settings that are shown as failing. They give a description of each, but don't mention where to change them though.
Many are set using the Local Security Policy tool, or the Group Policy Editor. Neither of which comes with XP Home. You can edit the registry directly to change settings though.

This link lists many of the registry keys that have to be edited directly, and lists the recommended settings.
For XP Home, the Group Policy Settings Reference spreadsheet can be searched for a specific setting to find the key to set in XP Home.

To set File permissions, you need to turn off simple file sharing (Control Panel | Folder Options | View, uncheck Use simple file sharing, last item). For XP Home, you'll need to reboot to safe mode to see the security tab, or download the two reg files from this post of Elvandil's. Be sure to run the undo reg file when done.

These are just recommendations, and are geared more for a business environment rather than a home environment. The Auditing settings for example, forcing users to change passwords, only allowing strong passwords, minimum length, etc, might not be useful at home.

My score has never been higher than 1.88.

HTH

Jerry
 

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.8

Hi everybody.
this is my first post on TechSpot...
and I`d like to ask a question(or two or three):what about the x1950pro AGP?
anybody seen it work?
benchmarks?
avalability?(europe/germany)
will it really be coming?
Have I spent 200.-? on the wrong card?([email protected])
 

A:x1950pro AGP!anyone seen any benchmarks?

Funny thing, we were just discussing this in the Socket 478 thread in the cpu/chipset forum.

I don't believe there is any hard data on this and it's likely just a rumor right now. Similar rumors occurred when Diamond made a typo on their website and listed an X1800 as AGP when it was a cut/paste job overlooked from an X800 HTML page they modified for the X1800.

I'd imagine hkpc or Tom's/Anannd's will get some solid info should there actually be any hint of an AGP based X1950. For now, it looks like the X1650 series will get the best chance of an AGP flavor.. but the X1950 is still only "rumor" material as I know of no local oem's with even so much as a future SKU or partner hint for the units.
 

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.4

hi everyone
i could not find a post anywhere purely for heaven benchmark 2.1 score till now!!!
so i started my own.. :P

this is my score

A:post your heaven 2.1 benchmarks here...

This is my score below.

Read other 2 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.4

speakeasy speed test today! no joke.....

16215 kbps down (fastest ive ever seen it in 6 months)

1479 up

also.. Comcast just announces some new modem/router that is capable of 150Mbits/sec down

how they gunna do it???

looks like they're gunna multiplex 4 separate coax cables into one (Super Modem) line per house.
this makes sense.. because i think the theoreticcal limit for coax is approx 30Mbits/sec (ish) per line.

wonder how much that'll be a month...
 

A:comcast benchmarks not too shabby

Read other 8 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.4

During my research on AMD CPUs for my next computer I came across this page of benchmark figures. Unfortunately, although it is obvious that the A64 3400+ processor is faster than the A64 3000+ processor, the numbers mean nothing to me so I am not sure just how much faster it is.

For a task such as video encoding using either the Athlon 64 3000+, 3200+ or 3400+ processor would the difference be something like 10 to 30 seconds or five to 10 minutes??

What about normal everyday tasks? When would the difference in speed actually be noticeable and by how much?

Would a kind person be able to translate and put these figures into perspective for me please?
 

A:Help required for interpreting benchmarks

Read other 10 answers
RELEVANCY SCORE 40.4

It seems that after the 3dmark initial accusations and the subsequent makeup with nVidia, that further issues have arisen. See the following link for a full explanation

http://www.tech-report.com/etc/2003q2/3dmurk03/index.x?pg=1Click to expand...
 

A:Nvidia Cheating on Benchmarks Again?

Link again

http://www.tech-report.com/etc/2003q2/3dmurk03/index.x?pg=1
 

Read other 1 answers